60 - Crappy Artist Banned, Mentally Challenged Up In Arms!
I haven't updated my deviantART page in over two years and I come to find that the last journal entry was about me being cold and referencing a crappy old radio show that nobody listens to. Despite that, for unknown reasons, I visit deviantART every day so if you thought I vanished and went elsewhere in the infinite squalor called the internet, you're wrong. But since this entry is about deviantART, you might be wondering why I don't post there, well there are actually three reasons why I'm updating to my LiveJournal and not on my deviantART page.
So after that, time to get to the main topic at hand: Some Brazilian artist, who's English skills are incredible if you took a Russian kid's basic English paper, ran it through every language in babelfish, then tried to imagine what the end result might sound like to a pidgeon, ended up getting banned on deviantART for this:
So basically, he draws sexual pictures of characters from children's cartoons shows so grown men can masturbate to them. This is confounding. I'll admit that I'm a grown adult who watches The Disney Channel from time to time to see Donald Duck rage while Mickey sings a song about sharing or some gay shit like that, but to consider sexual scenarios on these characters is nothing short of fucking nuts.
But alas, this event served as a useful tool for a college project I have to work on that tries to analyze fandom and the internet communities that encompass them. From studying various forums and their denizens for the better part of about twenty minutes in a two day span (the extended editions of the lord of the rings won't watch themselves, you know), I've since learned that people involved in fandom generally comprise of intellectually destitute people who simply "circlejerk" one another in their respective communities and will valiantly fend off any trouble from outside sources, even if the source is a well-meaning one such as an individual simply giving constructive criticism.
And this is exactly why I decided to post this, because the communities the banned guy belongs to are the most mind-boggling because they really aren't the brightest people in the world and I find it really odd that they appear to have their general online social life seemingly justified by a crudely drawn character from a cartoon program aimed at children aged 6-11. But that's not even the gist of it, apparently a lot of them watch cartoons not to enjoy them, but to enjoy the sexual possibilities with these characters. Take the banned guy for instance, he was overtly obsessed with the robot girl from "My Life As A Teenage Robot" but more so than any average person, his obsession with her seriously made me think that he pretended to have sex with her every night by fucking a toaster.
So imagine their surprise when one of their own gets banned from a website, all of a sudden the aforementioned circlejerking commences and they all get in a huff trying to valiantly defend a guy that most likely molests his vacuum cleaner, even going to the point of saying that he didn't do any of the things deviantART accused him of. Hold on there! Let's not get too stupid! I can confirm two offenses twice! "What?! Where!" you scream at me and point like you're Phoenix Wright, "This is trivial shit, why should we care?!" The lone internet ranger says in the back. Well if there's anything people on the internet love, it's trivial shit. Why else did one time the "Knight" article on Wikipedia was just a small blurb while the section on "Jedi Knight" was so extensive that were it a book, it'd be even longer than War and Peace?
The instances I'm talking about is when his egomaniacal dickery got the best of them and decided that he should sell his "artwork" and I mean those quotations because I don't consider him to be that great an artist, he can draw sure but his skill is vastly inferior to so many others on dA that I've come to enjoy. But anyway, he used deviantART journals to solicit money from people for erotic sketches of copyrighted characters and thus profited from the intellectual properties of others. If there was any major reason why he deserved a ticket to Bantown, that right there is it. But that still doesn't stop his circlejerk buddies from defending him from an imaginary injustice nonetheless, did I mention they masturbate to children's cartoons?
All in all, I feel the little robot-molesting guy deserved the ban, especially since he sold sketches, fucking sketches, where other people offered fully painted works for free. But not just any crappy sketches, sketches of cartoon kids fucking. As I said before, he's not that good of an artist to be able to get away with that, no matter what the content is, but I guess all you can really blame is the egocentric nature of a mentally handicapped perverted artist who spends his days watching crudely drawn cartoons and imagining sexual scenarios of animated children until the day comes where he's hung himself by the doorknob of his parents' basement with his pants to his ankles, holding a sketchbook with a Hello Kitty sticker on it. A sad portrayal of Romeo & Juliet, when will the day come when a man can live in harmony with the love of his life, a young cartoon robot, to cherish in matrimony happily ever after until death do they part? Hopefully never as far as reality is concerned. Dumbasses.
"In my defense, that koala was being kind of a dick."
Firstly, I'm not keen on being banned for some extraneously superfluous reason just because I hurt the feelings of some mentally deficient manchild.
Secondly, Since I apparently update annually, I figured that if I write an extra post here then I don't have to write squat until 2011.
Thirdly, the day may still come when the repertoire of internet comedy expands it's shelf space after the over-saturation of ninjas, pirates, and pictures of cats requesting fast food to include obscure radio show references and bears. And my last deviantART entry will stand among all others as being the Jesus of bear humour.
So after that, time to get to the main topic at hand: Some Brazilian artist, who's English skills are incredible if you took a Russian kid's basic English paper, ran it through every language in babelfish, then tried to imagine what the end result might sound like to a pidgeon, ended up getting banned on deviantART for this:
"Several year history of the submission of underage character erotica; the sale of this same erotica and other pornographic imagery though the use of publicly posted journals; sponsoring contests which encourage other deviants to produce erotica featuring underage characters."
So basically, he draws sexual pictures of characters from children's cartoons shows so grown men can masturbate to them. This is confounding. I'll admit that I'm a grown adult who watches The Disney Channel from time to time to see Donald Duck rage while Mickey sings a song about sharing or some gay shit like that, but to consider sexual scenarios on these characters is nothing short of fucking nuts.
But alas, this event served as a useful tool for a college project I have to work on that tries to analyze fandom and the internet communities that encompass them. From studying various forums and their denizens for the better part of about twenty minutes in a two day span (the extended editions of the lord of the rings won't watch themselves, you know), I've since learned that people involved in fandom generally comprise of intellectually destitute people who simply "circlejerk" one another in their respective communities and will valiantly fend off any trouble from outside sources, even if the source is a well-meaning one such as an individual simply giving constructive criticism.
And this is exactly why I decided to post this, because the communities the banned guy belongs to are the most mind-boggling because they really aren't the brightest people in the world and I find it really odd that they appear to have their general online social life seemingly justified by a crudely drawn character from a cartoon program aimed at children aged 6-11. But that's not even the gist of it, apparently a lot of them watch cartoons not to enjoy them, but to enjoy the sexual possibilities with these characters. Take the banned guy for instance, he was overtly obsessed with the robot girl from "My Life As A Teenage Robot" but more so than any average person, his obsession with her seriously made me think that he pretended to have sex with her every night by fucking a toaster.
So imagine their surprise when one of their own gets banned from a website, all of a sudden the aforementioned circlejerking commences and they all get in a huff trying to valiantly defend a guy that most likely molests his vacuum cleaner, even going to the point of saying that he didn't do any of the things deviantART accused him of. Hold on there! Let's not get too stupid! I can confirm two offenses twice! "What?! Where!" you scream at me and point like you're Phoenix Wright, "This is trivial shit, why should we care?!" The lone internet ranger says in the back. Well if there's anything people on the internet love, it's trivial shit. Why else did one time the "Knight" article on Wikipedia was just a small blurb while the section on "Jedi Knight" was so extensive that were it a book, it'd be even longer than War and Peace?
The instances I'm talking about is when his egomaniacal dickery got the best of them and decided that he should sell his "artwork" and I mean those quotations because I don't consider him to be that great an artist, he can draw sure but his skill is vastly inferior to so many others on dA that I've come to enjoy. But anyway, he used deviantART journals to solicit money from people for erotic sketches of copyrighted characters and thus profited from the intellectual properties of others. If there was any major reason why he deserved a ticket to Bantown, that right there is it. But that still doesn't stop his circlejerk buddies from defending him from an imaginary injustice nonetheless, did I mention they masturbate to children's cartoons?
All in all, I feel the little robot-molesting guy deserved the ban, especially since he sold sketches, fucking sketches, where other people offered fully painted works for free. But not just any crappy sketches, sketches of cartoon kids fucking. As I said before, he's not that good of an artist to be able to get away with that, no matter what the content is, but I guess all you can really blame is the egocentric nature of a mentally handicapped perverted artist who spends his days watching crudely drawn cartoons and imagining sexual scenarios of animated children until the day comes where he's hung himself by the doorknob of his parents' basement with his pants to his ankles, holding a sketchbook with a Hello Kitty sticker on it. A sad portrayal of Romeo & Juliet, when will the day come when a man can live in harmony with the love of his life, a young cartoon robot, to cherish in matrimony happily ever after until death do they part? Hopefully never as far as reality is concerned. Dumbasses.
"In my defense, that koala was being kind of a dick."
